| Title |
Are animal models useful for studying human disc disorders/degeneration?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, July 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-007-0414-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mauro Alini, Stephen M. Eisenstein, Keita Ito, Christopher Little, A. Annette Kettler, Koichi Masuda, James Melrose, Jim Ralphs, Ian Stokes, Hans Joachim Wilke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 427 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 409 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 106 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 12% |
| Researcher | 45 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 10% |
| Other | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 83 | 19% |
| Unknown | 76 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 103 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 67 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 5% |
| Materials Science | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 9% |
| Unknown | 100 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,932,966
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#526
of 5,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,820
of 79,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,366 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.