↓ Skip to main content

Computational Toxicology

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Computational Toxicology'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 What is Computational Toxicology?
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Computational toxicology: application in environmental chemicals.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Role of computational methods in pharmaceutical sciences.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Best practices in mathematical modeling.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Tools and techniques.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Prediction of physicochemical properties.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Informing mechanistic toxicology with computational molecular models.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Chemical structure representations and applications in computational toxicity.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Accessing and using chemical property databases.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Accessing, using, and creating chemical property databases for computational toxicology modeling.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Molecular dynamics.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Introduction to pharmacokinetics in clinical toxicology.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Modeling of Absorption
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Prediction of pharmacokinetic parameters.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Computational Toxicology
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Non-compartmental Analysis.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Compartmental modeling in the analysis of biological systems.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Physiologically based pharmacokinetic/toxicokinetic modeling.
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Interspecies extrapolation.
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Population effects and variability.
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Mechanism-Based Pharmacodynamic Modeling
Attention for Chapter 10: Accessing, using, and creating chemical property databases for computational toxicology modeling.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Accessing, using, and creating chemical property databases for computational toxicology modeling.
Chapter number 10
Book title
Computational Toxicology
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-050-2_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-049-6, 978-1-62703-050-2
Authors

Antony J. Williams, Sean Ekins, Ola Spjuth, Egon L. Willighagen, Williams, Antony J., Ekins, Sean, Spjuth, Ola, Willighagen, Egon L.

Editors

Brad Reisfeld, Arthur N. Mayeno

Abstract

Toxicity data is expensive to generate, is increasingly seen as precompetitive, and is frequently used for the generation of computational models in a discipline known as computational toxicology. Repositories of chemical property data are valuable for supporting computational toxicologists by providing access to data regarding potential toxicity issues with compounds as well as for the purpose of building structure-toxicity relationships and associated prediction models. These relationships use mathematical, statistical, and modeling computational approaches and can be used to understand the mechanisms by which chemicals cause harm and, ultimately, enable prediction of adverse effects of these chemicals to human health and/or the environment. Such approaches are of value as they offer an opportunity to prioritize chemicals for testing. An increasing amount of data used by computational toxicologists is being published into the public domain and, in parallel, there is a greater availability of Open Source software for the generation of computational models. This chapter provides an overview of the types of data and software available and how these may be used to produce predictive toxicology models for the community.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 13%
United States 1 13%
Brazil 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 50%
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 25%
Chemistry 2 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2017.
All research outputs
#2,336,845
of 25,079,131 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#372
of 14,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,592
of 176,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#5
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,079,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,102 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.