You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Best practices in mathematical modeling.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 4 |
| Book title |
Computational Toxicology
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-62703-050-2_4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-62703-049-6, 978-1-62703-050-2
|
| Authors |
Lisette G. de Pillis, Ami E. Radunskaya |
| Editors |
Brad Reisfeld, Arthur N. Mayeno |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 22% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 22% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 2 | 22% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,385,802
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,353
of 13,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,695
of 169,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#24
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,133 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.