↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of muscle hypertrophy following 6-month of continuous and periodic strength training

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 4,402)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
510 X users
facebook
13 Facebook pages
video
45 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
313 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Comparison of muscle hypertrophy following 6-month of continuous and periodic strength training
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00421-012-2511-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Riki Ogasawara, Tomohiro Yasuda, Naokata Ishii, Takashi Abe

Abstract

To compare the effects of a periodic resistance training (PTR) program with those of a continuous resistance training (CTR) program on muscle size and function, 14 young men were randomly divided into a CTR group and a PTR group. Both groups performed high-intensity bench press exercise training [75 % of one repetition maximum (1-RM); 3 sets of 10 reps] for 3 days per week. The CTR group trained continuously over a 24-week period, whereas the PTR group performed three cycles of 6-week training (or retraining), with 3-week detraining periods between training cycles. After an initial 6 weeks of training, increases in cross-sectional area (CSA) of the triceps brachii and pectoralis major muscles and maximum isometric voluntary contraction of the elbow extensors and 1-RM were similar between the two groups. In the CTR group, muscle CSA and strength gradually increased during the initial 6 weeks of training. However, the rate of increase in muscle CSA and 1-RM decreased gradually after that. In the PTR group, increase in muscle CSA and strength during the first 3-week detraining/6-week retraining cycle were similar to that in the CTR group during the corresponding period. However, increase in muscle CSA and strength during the second 3-week detraining/6-week retraining cycle were significantly higher in the PTR group than in the CTR group. Thus, overall improvements in muscle CSA and strength were similar between the groups. The results indicate that 3-week detraining/6-week retraining cycles result in muscle hypertrophy similar to that occurring with continuous resistance training after 24 weeks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 510 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 304 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 17%
Student > Bachelor 54 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 10%
Researcher 24 8%
Other 21 7%
Other 54 17%
Unknown 76 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 122 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 5%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 89 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 516. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#50,400
of 25,853,983 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#11
of 4,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190
of 192,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,853,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.