↓ Skip to main content

Cofactor Strap regulates oxidative phosphorylation and mitochondrial p53 activity through ATP synthase

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Death & Differentiation, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cofactor Strap regulates oxidative phosphorylation and mitochondrial p53 activity through ATP synthase
Published in
Cell Death & Differentiation, August 2014
DOI 10.1038/cdd.2014.135
Pubmed ID
Authors

S Maniam, A S Coutts, M R Stratford, J McGouran, B Kessler, N B La Thangue

Abstract

Metabolic reprogramming is a hallmark of cancer cells. Strap (stress-responsive activator of p300) is a novel TPR motif OB-fold protein that contributes to p53 transcriptional activation. We show here that, in addition to its established transcriptional role, Strap is localised at mitochondria where one of its key interaction partners is ATP synthase. Significantly, the interaction between Strap and ATP synthase downregulates mitochondrial ATP production. Under glucose-limiting conditions, cancer cells are sensitised by mitochondrial Strap to apoptosis, which is rescued by supplementing cells with an extracellular source of ATP. Furthermore, Strap augments the apoptotic effects of mitochondrial p53. These findings define Strap as a dual regulator of cellular reprogramming: first as a nuclear transcription cofactor and second in the direct regulation of mitochondrial respiration.Cell Death and Differentiation advance online publication, 29 August 2014; doi:10.1038/cdd.2014.135.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 31%
Researcher 8 28%
Student > Master 3 10%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 21%
Psychology 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2015.
All research outputs
#15,305,567
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Cell Death & Differentiation
#2,476
of 3,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,395
of 236,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Death & Differentiation
#39
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.