↓ Skip to main content

Acute inhalation of vaporized nicotine increases arterial pressure in young non-smokers: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Autonomic Research, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 780)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acute inhalation of vaporized nicotine increases arterial pressure in young non-smokers: a pilot study
Published in
Clinical Autonomic Research, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10286-015-0304-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

William H. Cooke, Anusheela Pokhrel, Colin Dowling, Donovan L. Fogt, Caroline A. Rickards

Abstract

Electronic cigarettes are growing in popularity, but the physiological consequences of vaporized nicotine are unknown. Twenty healthy non-smokers inhaled vaporized nicotine and placebo (randomized). Nicotine inhalation was associated with higher arterial pressures in the seated position, and increased arterial pressures in the head-up positions with no other effects on autonomic control. Our results show that vaporized nicotine inhalation is not innocuous. Longitudinal studies in otherwise healthy non-smokers should be conducted.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 78 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Master 11 14%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Other 6 8%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 20 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 23%
Psychology 8 10%
Environmental Science 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 27 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,243,786
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Autonomic Research
#25
of 780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,501
of 264,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Autonomic Research
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them