You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy and safety of the “mother’s kiss” technique: a systematic review of case reports and case series
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.111864 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie Cook, Martin Burton, Paul Glasziou |
| Abstract |
Foreign bodies lodged in the nasal cavity are a common problem in children, and their removal can be challenging. The published studies relating to the "mother's kiss" all take the form of case reports and case series. We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of this technique. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 9 | 13% |
| Saudi Arabia | 4 | 6% |
| Japan | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 13% |
| Scientists | 7 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 39 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 30% |
| Unknown | 6 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 57% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2023.
All research outputs
#471,206
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#817
of 9,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,475
of 193,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#6
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.