You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Targeted fluconazole prophylaxis for high-risk very low birth weight infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Pediatrics, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00431-012-1760-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Asaph Rolnitsky, Itzhak Levy, Lea Sirota, Itamar Shalit, Gil Klinger |
| Abstract |
Antifungal prophylaxis is increasingly used in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants who are at risk for severe fungal infections. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of targeted fluconazole prophylaxis for high-risk VLBW infants. A retrospective cohort study with historical controls was performed. During the period 2007-2008, all high-risk VLBW infants (birth weight, ≤1,000 g; gestational age, ≤28 weeks; seven antimicrobial therapy or additional risk factors present) received fluconazole prophylaxis until risk factors were not present. Treated infants were compared to a gestational age- and birth weight-matched untreated cohort. Statistical analyses used univariate and multivariate analyses. The main outcome variable was a breakthrough fungal bloodstream infection (BSI). The prophylaxis cohort of 130 VLBW infants was compared to 319 control infants. The rate of fungal infections was significantly lower in the fluconazole prophylaxis group (1 of 130 vs. 19 of 319, p = 0.016); however, they did not differ in mortality (16.2 vs. 15 %, p = 0.77) or complications of prematurity. Fluconazole prophylaxis was associated with a significant decrease in candidal BSI (odds ratio, 0.05; 95 % confidence interval, 0.005-0.523). Selective vs. nonselective prophylaxis reduced the number of infants treated from 247 to 130. Conclusion Targeted fluconazole prophylaxis in VLBW infants is effective in preventing fungal infections without increasing the risk of BSI among low-risk infants. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 24% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 55% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,171,868
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#3,410
of 3,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,906
of 164,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#15
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.