↓ Skip to main content

Remote management of covid-19 using home pulse oximetry and virtual ward support

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
884 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Remote management of covid-19 using home pulse oximetry and virtual ward support
Published in
British Medical Journal, March 2021
DOI 10.1136/bmj.n677
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trisha Greenhalgh, Matthew Knight, Matt Inda-Kim, Naomi J Fulop, Jonathan Leach, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 884 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 188 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 12%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Other 10 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 4%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 79 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 24%
Engineering 15 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Chemistry 5 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 92 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 684. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#31,439
of 25,848,962 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#670
of 65,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,230
of 457,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#34
of 768 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,962 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 768 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.