You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validating the Eating Disorder Inventory-3 (EDI-3): A Comparison Between 561 Female Eating Disorders Patients and 878 Females from the General Population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10862-010-9207-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Loa Clausen, Jan H. Rosenvinge, Oddgeir Friborg, Kristian Rokkedal |
| Abstract |
The Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI) is used worldwide in research and clinical work. The 3(rd) version (EDI-3) has been used in recent research, yet without any independent testing of its psychometric properties. The aim of the present study was twofold: 1) to establish national norms and to compare them with the US and international norms, and 2) to examine the factor structure, the internal consistency, the sensitivity and the specificity of subscale scores. Participants were Danish adult female patients (N = 561) from a specialist treatment centre and a control group (N = 878) was women selected from the Danish Civil Registration system. Small but significant differences were found between Danish and international, as well as US norms. Overall, the factor structure was confirmed, the internal consistency of the subscales was satisfactory, the discriminative validity was good, and sensitivity and specificity were excellent. The implications from these results are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 336 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 58 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 54 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 14% |
| Researcher | 30 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 9% |
| Other | 52 | 15% |
| Unknown | 69 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 152 | 44% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 34 | 10% |
| Unknown | 86 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#5,049,724
of 24,716,872 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
#110
of 712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,344
of 103,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,716,872 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them