You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical prediction tools to identify patients at highest risk of myeloma in primary care: a retrospective open cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, April 2021
|
DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2020.0697 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Constantinos Koshiaris, Ann Van den Bruel, Brian D Nicholson, Sarah Lay-Flurrie, FD Richard Hobbs, Jason L Oke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 9 | 50% |
New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
Japan | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
Scientists | 5 | 28% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Researcher | 2 | 6% |
Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 17 | 55% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 23% |
Psychology | 2 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 17 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,608,478
of 24,464,848 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#797
of 4,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,875
of 432,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#29
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,464,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,549 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.