You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Epidemiology and Clinical Spectrum of Melioidosis: 540 Cases from the 20 Year Darwin Prospective Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, November 2010
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000900 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bart J. Currie, Linda Ward, Allen C. Cheng |
Abstract |
Over 20 years, from October 1989, the Darwin prospective melioidosis study has documented 540 cases from tropical Australia, providing new insights into epidemiology and the clinical spectrum. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
Thailand | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Denmark | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 314 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 15% |
Student > Master | 44 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 34 | 10% |
Researcher | 30 | 9% |
Other | 27 | 8% |
Other | 68 | 21% |
Unknown | 74 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 115 | 35% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 13% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 27 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 8% |
Unspecified | 5 | 2% |
Other | 26 | 8% |
Unknown | 86 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#915,334
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#504
of 9,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,003
of 190,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#2
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.