↓ Skip to main content

Classical tachyons and possible applications

Overview of attention for article published in La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Classical tachyons and possible applications
Published in
La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento, October 2007
DOI 10.1007/bf02724327
Authors

E. Recami

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Portugal 1 5%
Italy 1 5%
Unknown 18 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 38%
Researcher 6 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 15 71%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento
#35
of 95 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,405
of 84,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 95 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.