You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium summit on the management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gut, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303108 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcia Irene Canto, Femme Harinck, Ralph H Hruban, George Johan Offerhaus, Jan-Werner Poley, Ihab Kamel, Yung Nio, Richard S Schulick, Claudio Bassi, Irma Kluijt, Michael J Levy, Amitabh Chak, Paul Fockens, Michael Goggins, Marco Bruno, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, Detlef Bartsch, Katharina Biermann, Terri Brentnall, Amitabh Chak, Petr Dite, Timothy Donahue, Dayna Early, James Farrell, Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo, Harold Frucht, Noriyoshi Fukushima, Jenny Geurts, Pascal Hamell, Julio Iglesias-Garcia, Alison Klein, Guenter Kloeppel, Jesse Lachter, Peter Langer, Jeffrey Lee, Michael Levy, Hiroyuki Maguchi, Daniel Margolis, Takao Ohtsuka, Sara Olson, Gloria Petersen, Thomas Savides, Sapna Syngal, Eric Tamm, Masao Tanaka, Hans Vasen, Anja Wagner, Huamin Wang, David Williams, Kenjii Yamao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 21% |
| United States | 4 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
| Romania | 1 | 4% |
| China | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 57% |
| Scientists | 5 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 487 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 480 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 66 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 11% |
| Other | 50 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 10% |
| Other | 113 | 23% |
| Unknown | 100 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 239 | 49% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 48 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 7% |
| Unknown | 121 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2020.
All research outputs
#589,277
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Gut
#340
of 7,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,145
of 199,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut
#3
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.