You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effectiveness of individualized physiotherapy on pain and functioning compared to a standard exercise protocol in patients presenting with clinical signs of subacromial impingement syndrome. A randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-11-114 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thilo O Kromer, Rob A de Bie, Caroline HG Bastiaenen |
Abstract |
Shoulder impingement syndrome is a common musculoskeletal complaint leading to significant reduction of health and disability. Physiotherapy is often the first choice of treatment although its effectiveness is still under debate. Systematic reviews in this field highlight the need for more high quality trials to investigate the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 468 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
United States | 3 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 454 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 99 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 67 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 32 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 6% |
Other | 80 | 17% |
Unknown | 118 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 156 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 81 | 17% |
Sports and Recreations | 28 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 15 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 2% |
Other | 34 | 7% |
Unknown | 143 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2014.
All research outputs
#13,233,615
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,829
of 4,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,500
of 96,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#18
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.