You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
LIDAR and Monocular Based Overhanging Obstacle Detection
|
---|---|
Published in |
Procedia Computer Science, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.218 |
Authors |
Jeffery Young, Milan Simic |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 55 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 19% |
Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
Researcher | 9 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
Professor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 12 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 20 | 35% |
Computer Science | 17 | 30% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 13 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,486,330
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Procedia Computer Science
#528
of 2,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,808
of 353,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Procedia Computer Science
#89
of 430 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,307 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 430 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.