↓ Skip to main content

Functional brain networks related to individual differences in human intelligence at rest

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
24 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional brain networks related to individual differences in human intelligence at rest
Published in
Scientific Reports, August 2016
DOI 10.1038/srep32328
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luke J. Hearne, Jason B. Mattingley, Luca Cocchi

Abstract

Intelligence is a fundamental ability that sets humans apart from other animal species. Despite its importance in defining human behaviour, the neural networks responsible for intelligence are not well understood. The dominant view from neuroimaging work suggests that intelligent performance on a range of tasks is underpinned by segregated interactions in a fronto-parietal network of brain regions. Here we asked whether fronto-parietal interactions associated with intelligence are ubiquitous, or emerge from more widespread associations in a task-free context. First we undertook an exploratory mapping of the existing literature on functional connectivity associated with intelligence. Next, to empirically test hypotheses derived from the exploratory mapping, we performed network analyses in a cohort of 317 unrelated participants from the Human Connectome Project. Our results revealed a novel contribution of across-network interactions between default-mode and fronto-parietal networks to individual differences in intelligence at rest. Specifically, we found that greater connectivity in the resting state was associated with higher intelligence scores. Our findings highlight the need to broaden the dominant fronto-parietal conceptualisation of intelligence to encompass more complex and context-specific network dynamics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 238 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 16%
Researcher 34 14%
Student > Master 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 27 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Other 38 16%
Unknown 55 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 58 24%
Neuroscience 38 16%
Engineering 14 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 5%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 71 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,431,920
of 25,339,932 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#13,814
of 139,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,357
of 347,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#426
of 3,674 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,339,932 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 139,456 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,674 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.