↓ Skip to main content

CD151 Gene and Protein Expression Provides Independent Prognostic Information for Patients with Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and Gastroesophageal Junction Treated by Esophagectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CD151 Gene and Protein Expression Provides Independent Prognostic Information for Patients with Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and Gastroesophageal Junction Treated by Esophagectomy
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2016
DOI 10.1245/s10434-016-5504-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver M. Fisher, Angelique J. Levert-Mignon, Christopher W. Lehane, Natalia K. Botelho, Jesper L. V. Maag, Melissa L. Thomas, Melanie Edwards, Sarah J. Lord, Yuri V. Bobryshev, David C. Whiteman, Reginald V. Lord

Abstract

Esophageal and gastroesophageal junctional (GEJ) adenocarcinoma is one of the most fatal cancers and has the fastest rising incidence rate of all cancers. Identification of biomarkers is needed to tailor treatments to each patient's tumor biology and prognosis. Gene expression profiling was performed in a test cohort of 80 chemoradiotherapy (CRTx)-naïve patients with external validation in a separate cohort of 62 CRTx-naïve patients and 169 patients with advanced-stage disease treated with CRTx. As a novel prognostic biomarker after external validation, CD151 showed promise. Patients exhibiting high levels of CD151 (≥median) had a longer median overall survival than patients with low CD151 tumor levels (median not reached vs. 30.9 months; p = 0.01). This effect persisted in a multivariable Cox-regression model with adjustment for tumor stage [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.33; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.14-0.78; p = 0.01] and was further corroborated through immunohistochemical analysis (aHR, 0.22; 95 % CI, 0.08-0.59; p = 0.003). This effect was not found in the separate cohort of CRTx-exposed patients. Tumoral expression levels of CD151 may provide independent prognostic information not gained by conventional staging of patients with esophageal and GEJ adenocarcinoma treated by esophagectomy alone.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 31%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Unspecified 1 6%
Librarian 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2016.
All research outputs
#18,468,369
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#5,000
of 6,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,857
of 336,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#103
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.