↓ Skip to main content

The progression of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease and their contribution to motor disability and quality of life

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The progression of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease and their contribution to motor disability and quality of life
Published in
Journal of Neurology, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00415-012-6557-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angelo Antonini, Paolo Barone, Roberto Marconi, Letterio Morgante, Salvatore Zappulla, Francesco Ernesto Pontieri, Silvia Ramat, Maria Gabriella Ceravolo, Giuseppe Meco, Giulio Cicarelli, Massimo Pederzoli, Michela Manfredi, Roberto Ceravolo, Marco Mucchiut, Giampiero Volpe, Giovanni Abbruzzese, Edo Bottacchi, Luigi Bartolomei, Giuseppe Ciacci, Antonino Cannas, Maria Giovanna Randisi, Alfredo Petrone, Mario Baratti, Vincenzo Toni, Giovanni Cossu, Paolo Del Dotto, Anna Rita Bentivoglio, Michele Abrignani, Rossana Scala, Franco Pennisi, Rocco Quatrale, Rosa Maria Gaglio, Alessandra Nicoletti, Michele Perini, Tania Avarello, Antonio Pisani, Augusto Scaglioni, Paolo Emilio Martinelli, Francesco Iemolo, Laura Ferigo, Pasqualino Simone, Paola Soliveri, Biagio Troianiello, Domenico Consoli, Alessandro Mauro, Leonardo Lopiano, Giuseppe Nastasi, Carlo Colosimo

Abstract

Non-motor symptoms are gaining relevance in Parkinson's disease (PD) management but little is known about their progression and contribution to deterioration of quality of life. We followed prospectively 707 PD patients (62 % males) for 2 years. We assessed non-motor symptoms referred to 12 different domains, each including 1-10 specific symptoms, as well as motor state (UPDRS), general cognition, and life quality. Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) stage was used to categorize patient status (I-II mild; III moderate; IV-V severe). We found that individual non-motor symptoms had variable evolution over the 2-year follow-up with sleep, gastrointestinal, attention/memory and skin disturbances (hyperhidrosis and seborrhea) becoming more prevalent and psychiatric, cardiovascular, and respiratory disorders becoming less prevalent. Development of symptoms in the cardiovascular, apathy, urinary, psychiatric, and fatigue domains was associated with significant life-quality worsening (p < 0.0045, alpha with Bonferroni correction). During the observation period, 123 patients (17 %) worsened clinically while 584 were rated as stable. There was a fivefold greater increase in UPDRS motor score in worse compared with stable patients over 24 months (p < 0.0001 vs. baseline both in stable and worse group). The total number of reported non-motor symptoms increased over 24 months in patients with motor worsening compared to stable ones (p < 0.001). Thirty-nine patients died (3.4 % of patients evaluable at baseline) with mean age at death of 74 years. Deceased patients were older, had significantly higher H&Y stage and motor score, and reported a greater number of non-motor symptoms at baseline. In conclusion, overall non-motor symptom progression does not follow motor deterioration, is symptom-specific, and only development of specific domains negatively impacts quality of life. These results have consequences for drug studies targeting non-motor features.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 168 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Master 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 39 23%
Unknown 41 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 25%
Neuroscience 31 18%
Psychology 21 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 47 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,940,317
of 23,577,547 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#298
of 4,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,099
of 165,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#2
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,547 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.