↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: position paper

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
294 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: position paper
Published in
Journal of Neurology, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00415-012-6678-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Pia Amato, Dawn Langdon, Xavier Montalban, Ralph H. B. Benedict, John DeLuca, Lauren B. Krupp, Alan J. Thompson, Giancarlo Comi

Abstract

Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS) is common, debilitating and burdensome. Key evidence from trials was reviewed to enable recommendations to be made to guide clinical practice and research. Behavioural and pharmacological interventions on cognition reported in published studies were reviewed. Most studies evaluating behavioural treatment for impairment in learning and memory, deficits of attention and executive function have demonstrated some improvement. Controlled studies in relapsing remitting MS indicate interferon (IFN) β-1b and IFN β-1a were associated with modest cognitive improvement. The effects of symptomatic therapies such as modafinil and donepezil are inconsistent. Most studies yielding positive findings have significant methodological difficulties limiting the confidence in making any broad treatment recommendations. There are no published reports of glatiramer acetate, natalizumab and fingolimod being effective in improving cognition in controlled trials. The effects of disease modifying therapies in other forms of MS and clinically isolated syndrome have not yielded positive results. Data linking behavioural therapy, symptomatic treatment or disease modifying treatment, to either reducing cognitive decline or improving impaired cognition are limited and inconsistent. The treatment and prevention of cognitive impairment needs to remain a key research focus, identifying new interventions and improving clinical trial methodology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 2%
Portugal 2 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 282 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 13%
Student > Master 36 12%
Researcher 35 12%
Student > Bachelor 30 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 9%
Other 66 22%
Unknown 65 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 27%
Psychology 53 18%
Neuroscience 37 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 80 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,161,213
of 23,393,453 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#701
of 4,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,881
of 280,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#8
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,393,453 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.