↓ Skip to main content

Efavirenz, in Contrast to Nevirapine, is Associated With Unfavorable Progesterone and Antiretroviral Levels When Coadministered With Combined Oral Contraceptives

Overview of attention for article published in JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efavirenz, in Contrast to Nevirapine, is Associated With Unfavorable Progesterone and Antiretroviral Levels When Coadministered With Combined Oral Contraceptives
Published in
JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, April 2013
DOI 10.1097/qai.0b013e31827e8f98
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadia Kancheva Landolt, Nittaya Phanuphak, Sasiwimol Ubolyam, Suteeraporn Pinyakorn, Rosalin Kriengsinyot, Jennisa Ahluwalia, Parawee Thongpaeng, Meena Gorowara, Narukjaporn Thammajaruk, Surasith Chaithongwongwatthana, Joep M. A. Lange, Jintanat Ananworanich

Abstract

Effective contraception has been widely promoted for HIV-positive women. However, there are limited data on the interactions between combined hormonal contraceptives and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 4 9%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#5,165,207
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
#844
of 4,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,623
of 209,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
#12
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.