You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Call for emergency action to limit global temperature increases, restore biodiversity, and protect health
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, September 2021
|
DOI | 10.3399/bjgp21x717065 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lukoye Atwoli, Abdullah H Baqui, Thomas Benfield, Raffaella Bosurgi, Fiona Godlee, Stephen Hancocks, Richard Horton, Laurie Laybourn-Langton, Carlos Augusto Monteiro, Ian Norman, Kirsten Patrick, Nigel Praities, Marcel GM Olde Rikkert, Eric J Rubin, Peush Sahni, Richard Smith, Nick Talley, Sue Turale, Damián Vázquez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 19 | 48% |
India | 2 | 5% |
United States | 2 | 5% |
Colombia | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Ireland | 1 | 3% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 29 | 73% |
Scientists | 5 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 21% |
Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,168,760
of 25,168,110 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#537
of 4,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,035
of 423,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#9
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,168,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.