You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An In-Depth Analysis of a Piece of Shit: Distribution of Schistosoma mansoni and Hookworm Eggs in Human Stool
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001969 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefanie J. Krauth, Jean T. Coulibaly, Stefanie Knopp, Mahamadou Traoré, Eliézer K. N'Goran, Jürg Utzinger |
| Abstract |
An accurate diagnosis of helminth infection is important to improve patient management. However, there is considerable intra- and inter-specimen variation of helminth egg counts in human feces. Homogenization of stool samples has been suggested to improve diagnostic accuracy, but there are no detailed investigations. Rapid disintegration of hookworm eggs constitutes another problem in epidemiological surveys. We studied the spatial distribution of Schistosoma mansoni and hookworm eggs in stool samples, the effect of homogenization, and determined egg counts over time in stool samples stored under different conditions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 970 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 209 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 166 | 17% |
| Canada | 51 | 5% |
| Australia | 26 | 3% |
| Chile | 24 | 2% |
| Germany | 21 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 16 | 2% |
| France | 16 | 2% |
| Sweden | 13 | 1% |
| Other | 117 | 12% |
| Unknown | 311 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 605 | 62% |
| Scientists | 294 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 39 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 32 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 407 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 2% |
| Germany | 6 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 364 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 94 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 92 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 71 | 17% |
| Unknown | 46 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 167 | 41% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 22 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 65 | 16% |
| Unknown | 65 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 902. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#19,680
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#7
of 9,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74
of 290,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#1
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.