↓ Skip to main content

Rapidly Progressive Infected Coronary Artery Aneurysm

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation Journal, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapidly Progressive Infected Coronary Artery Aneurysm
Published in
Circulation Journal, August 2021
DOI 10.1253/circj.cj-21-0611
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kanichi Otowa, Akio Chikata, Michiro Maruyama, Kazuo Usuda

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2021.
All research outputs
#15,480,575
of 25,974,666 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#1,199
of 2,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,331
of 440,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#16
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,974,666 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.