You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A worldwide collaboration to harmonize guidelines for the long‐term follow‐up of childhood and young adult cancer survivors: A report from the international late effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatric Blood and Cancer, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/pbc.24445 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leontien C.M. Kremer, Renée L. Mulder, Kevin C. Oeffinger, Smita Bhatia, Wendy Landier, Gill Levitt, Louis S. Constine, W. Hamish Wallace, Huib N. Caron, Saro H. Armenian, Roderick Skinner, Melissa M. Hudson |
| Abstract |
Childhood and young adult cancer survivors should receive optimum care to reduce the consequences of late effects and improve quality of life. We can facilitate achieving this goal by international collaboration in guideline development. In 2010, the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group was initiated. The aim of the harmonization endeavor is to establish a common vision and integrated strategy for the surveillance of late effects in childhood and young adult cancer survivors. With the implementation of our evidence-based methods, we provide a framework for the harmonization of guidelines for the long-term follow-up of childhood and young adult cancer survivors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 134 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 12% |
| Researcher | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 17% |
| Unknown | 38 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 39 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,833,212
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Blood and Cancer
#252
of 6,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,194
of 295,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Blood and Cancer
#3
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,163 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.