↓ Skip to main content

Midterm Results from an International Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Bipolar with Monopolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate

Overview of attention for article published in European Urology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Midterm Results from an International Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Bipolar with Monopolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate
Published in
European Urology, October 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.10.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charalampos Mamoulakis, Michael Schulze, Andreas Skolarikos, Gerasimos Alivizatos, Roberto M. Scarpa, Jens J. Rassweiler, Jean J.M.C.H. de la Rosette, Cesare M. Scoffone

Abstract

Pooled data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with short-term follow-up have shown a safety advantage for bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) compared with monopolar TURP (M-TURP). However, RCTs with follow-up >12 mo are scarce.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 18%
Other 9 16%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 17 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Urology
#3,431
of 6,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,921
of 197,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Urology
#31
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.