↓ Skip to main content

Community transmission and viral load kinetics of the SARS-CoV-2 delta (B.1.617.2) variant in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in the UK: a prospective, longitudinal, cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Infectious Diseases, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 6,175)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
649 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
628 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Community transmission and viral load kinetics of the SARS-CoV-2 delta (B.1.617.2) variant in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in the UK: a prospective, longitudinal, cohort study
Published in
Lancet Infectious Diseases, October 2021
DOI 10.1016/s1473-3099(21)00648-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anika Singanayagam, Seran Hakki, Jake Dunning, Kieran J Madon, Michael A Crone, Aleksandra Koycheva, Nieves Derqui-Fernandez, Jack L Barnett, Michael G Whitfield, Robert Varro, Andre Charlett, Rhia Kundu, Joe Fenn, Jessica Cutajar, Valerie Quinn, Emily Conibear, Wendy Barclay, Paul S Freemont, Graham P Taylor, Shazaad Ahmad, Maria Zambon, Neil M Ferguson, Ajit Lalvani, ATACCC Study Investigators, Anjna Badhan, Simon Dustan, Chitra Tejpal, Anjeli V Ketkar, Janakan Sam Narean, Sarah Hammett, Eimear McDermott, Timesh Pillay, Hamish Houston, Constanta Luca, Jada Samuel, Samuel Bremang, Samuel Evetts, John Poh, Charlotte Anderson, David Jackson, Shahjahan Miah, Joanna Ellis, Angie Lackenby

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19,836 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 628 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 628 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 80 13%
Other 59 9%
Student > Master 53 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 8%
Student > Bachelor 45 7%
Other 90 14%
Unknown 250 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 23 4%
Other 112 18%
Unknown 277 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17912. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2024.
All research outputs
#43
of 26,020,829 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#2
of 6,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6
of 446,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#1
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,020,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 95.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.