You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Is the pain of activity log-books worth the gain in precision when distinguishing wear and non-wear time for tri-axial accelerometers?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.12.002 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Geeske Peeters, Yolanda van Gellecum, Gemma Ryde, Nicolas Aguilar Farías, Wendy J. Brown |
Abstract |
To compare three methods for assessing wear time from accelerometer data: automated, log-books and a combination of the two. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 86 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 24% |
Researcher | 16 | 18% |
Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 16 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 17 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 10% |
Psychology | 7 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 15% |
Unknown | 21 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2016.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
#2,380
of 2,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,901
of 289,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
#26
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.