↓ Skip to main content

Binding serial order to representations in working memory: a spatial/verbal dissociation

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Binding serial order to representations in working memory: a spatial/verbal dissociation
Published in
Memory & Cognition, November 2010
DOI 10.3758/s13421-010-0012-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leon Gmeindl, Megan Walsh, Susan M. Courtney

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 72 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 23%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 42 54%
Neuroscience 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2016.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#1,061
of 1,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,690
of 114,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#18
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.