↓ Skip to main content

Motivation and Self-Regulation in Addiction

Overview of attention for article published in Perspectives on Psychological Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Motivation and Self-Regulation in Addiction
Published in
Perspectives on Psychological Science, January 2013
DOI 10.1177/1745691612457575
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cătălina E. Köpetz, Carl W. Lejuez, Reinout W. Wiers, Arie W. Kruglanski

Abstract

Addiction models have frequently invoked motivational mechanisms to explain the initiation and maintenance of addictive behaviors. However, in doing so, these models have emphasized the unique characteristics of addictive behaviors and overlooked the commonalities that they share with motivated behaviors in general. As a consequence, addiction research has failed to connect with and take advantage of promising and highly relevant advances in motivation and self-regulation research. The present article is a call for a convergence of the previous approaches to addictive behavior and the new advances in basic motivation and self-regulation. The authors emphasize the commonalities that addictive behaviors may share with motivated behavior in general. In addition, it is suggested that the same psychological principles underlying motivated action in general may apply to understand challenging aspects of the etiology and maintenance of addictive behaviors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 201 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 15%
Student > Master 31 14%
Researcher 26 12%
Professor 16 7%
Other 44 20%
Unknown 34 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 111 51%
Business, Management and Accounting 15 7%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 4%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 48 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,521,934
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives on Psychological Science
#627
of 1,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,469
of 284,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives on Psychological Science
#9
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 71.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.