You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association of 25‐hydroxyvitamin D with type 2 diabetes among patients undergoing coronary angiography: cross‐sectional findings from the LUdwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Endocrinology, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/cen.12024 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bríain O'Hartaigh, G. Neil Thomas, Günther Silbernagel, Jos A. Bosch, Stefan Pilz, Adrian Loerbroks, Marcus E. Kleber, Tanja B. Grammer, Bernhard O. Böhm, Winfried März |
| Abstract |
Evidence suggests that vitamin D may protect against the onset of diabetes. However, the mechanisms underlying the role of vitamin D on glycaemic status are unclear and warrant further investigation. We sought to determine the relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) and glycaemic status among intermediate-to-high-risk patients scheduled for coronary angiography. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2013.
All research outputs
#14,644,315
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Endocrinology
#1,736
of 2,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,272
of 204,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Endocrinology
#39
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.