You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Randomized clinical trial of donor‐site wound dressings after split‐skin grafting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Surgery, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/bjs.9045 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
F. E. Brölmann, A. M. Eskes, J. C. Goslings, F. B. Niessen, R. de Bree, A. C. Vahl, E. G. Pierik, H. Vermeulen, D. T. Ubbink, on behalf of the REMBRANDT study group |
| Abstract |
The aim was to study which dressing material was best for healing donor-site wounds (DSWs) after split-skin grafting as there is wide variation in existing methods, ranging from classical gauze dressings to modern silicone dressings. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 144 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 14% |
| Researcher | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 17% |
| Unknown | 40 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 54% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 43 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2013.
All research outputs
#14,742,867
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Surgery
#4,395
of 5,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,435
of 280,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Surgery
#26
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.