You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: Do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it work best?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.dcn.2012.11.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolin Eberl, Reinout W. Wiers, Steffen Pawelczack, Mike Rinck, Eni S. Becker, Johannes Lindenmeyer |
| Abstract |
Alcoholism is a progressive neurocognitive developmental disorder. Recent evidence shows that computerized training interventions (Cognitive Bias Modification, CBM) can reverse some of these maladaptively changed neurocognitive processes. A first clinical study of a CBM, called alcohol-avoidance training, found that trained alcoholic patients showed less relapse at one-year follow-up than control patients. The present study tested the replication of this result, and questions about mediation and moderation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 2 | 33% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 444 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 429 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 82 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 81 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 13% |
| Researcher | 53 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 57 | 13% |
| Unknown | 95 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 231 | 52% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 36 | 8% |
| Unknown | 115 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,622,393
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
#323
of 1,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,877
of 192,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.