You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
From theory to practice: a Canadian case study of the utility of climate change adaptation frameworks to address health impacts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Public Health, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00038-011-0292-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kaila-Lea Clarke, Peter Berry |
| Abstract |
It is now recognized that climate change affects human health. The question is how to adapt. This article examines mainstreaming climate considerations into public health programs and the utility of climate change and health adaptation frameworks, using Ontario, Canada, as a case study. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 14 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 12% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 26% |
| Unknown | 29 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2013.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#1,429
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,675
of 141,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#23
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.