↓ Skip to main content

A descriptive study of the perceptions and behaviors of waterpipe use by university students in the Western Cape, South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Tobacco Induced Diseases, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A descriptive study of the perceptions and behaviors of waterpipe use by university students in the Western Cape, South Africa
Published in
Tobacco Induced Diseases, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1617-9625-11-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karin E Daniels, Nicolette V Roman

Abstract

Waterpipe smoking started as a cultural phenomenon but has become a social phenomenon. Hookah cafes are an increasingly popular venue for socializing. Studies suggest that waterpipe users perceive smoking the waterpipe as less addictive and harmful than cigarette smoking. The aim of this study was to assess the beliefs, and associated behaviours, regarding the health-risk of smoking the waterpipe.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 97 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 18%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 25 26%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Psychology 5 5%
Arts and Humanities 5 5%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 26 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,332,604
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from Tobacco Induced Diseases
#54
of 601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,647
of 293,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tobacco Induced Diseases
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them