↓ Skip to main content

Oral health among children with congenital heart defects in Western Norway

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 283)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oral health among children with congenital heart defects in Western Norway
Published in
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40368-016-0243-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. B. Sivertsen, J. Aßmus, G. Greve, A. N. Åstrøm, M. S. Skeie

Abstract

This was to describe oral health in children with congenital heart defects (CHD), to evaluate association of different background variables with oral health, and to compare caries prevalence at dentine level with caries data in the general population. In this cross-sectional study, 5-year-old children in Western Norway with a need for lifelong follow-up due to CHD were invited to participate (n = 100). Children born in 2005, 2006, and 2007 underwent a comprehensive oral health examination during the period 2010-2012. Caries prevalence at the dentine level was compared with data available for 5-year-old children from the general population of Western Norway (n = 18,974). The response rate was 67 %. Caries prevalence in children with CHD at d1-5mft was 37.3 % and at d3-5mft 25.4 %. Few children (n = 4) had experienced fillings, indicating an unmet need for operative treatment. Enamel lesions (d1-2s) exceeded dentine lesions (d3-5s) in the study group, 60 % versus 40 %, indicating a significant need of non-operative treatment. At dentine level, caries prevalence in children with CHD was significantly higher than in children in the general population (25.4 versus 18.3 %). Erosion was more prevalent than caries (50.7 versus 37.3 %). In total, 37.3 % of all children had d3-5mfs caries, erosion (grades 3 or 4), developmental defects of enamel (DDE) with post-eruptive breakdown of enamel and exposure into dentine, or combinations of the diagnoses. Investigated background factors did not significantly affect caries, erosion, or DDE. More than a third of the children with CHD were found to have an oral health status that may imply risk for systemic hazardous effects.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Librarian 4 5%
Lecturer 3 4%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 32 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Computer Science 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 37 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2016.
All research outputs
#5,764,740
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
#45
of 283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,204
of 322,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 283 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them