You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Haptic and Audio Interaction Design
|
---|---|
Published by |
ADS, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-15841-4 |
ISBNs |
978-3-64-215840-7, 978-3-64-215841-4
|
Editors |
Rolf Nordahl, Stefania Serafin, Federico Fontana, Stephen Brewster |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2015.
All research outputs
#5,907,558
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#7,656
of 37,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,526
of 164,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#210
of 793 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,407 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 793 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.