↓ Skip to main content

Relationship Between Temperature, Hematoma Growth, and Functional Outcome After Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Neurocritical Care, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relationship Between Temperature, Hematoma Growth, and Functional Outcome After Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Published in
Neurocritical Care, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12028-012-9779-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fred Rincon, Patrick Lyden, Stephan A. Mayer

Abstract

Fever and hematoma growth are known to be independent predictors of poor outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We sought to assess the distribution of temperature at different stages in relation to hematoma growth and functional outcome at 90 days in a cohort of ICH patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 3%
United States 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 61 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Other 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 22 34%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 51%
Neuroscience 6 9%
Psychology 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2013.
All research outputs
#20,182,546
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Neurocritical Care
#1,391
of 1,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,085
of 170,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurocritical Care
#18
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.