↓ Skip to main content

Photoreceptors of the retina and pinealocytes of the pineal gland share common components of signal transduction

Overview of attention for article published in Neurochemical Research, January 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 2,215)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
71 Facebook pages
googleplus
53 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Photoreceptors of the retina and pinealocytes of the pineal gland share common components of signal transduction
Published in
Neurochemical Research, January 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00966868
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard N. Lolley, Cheryl M. Craft, Rehwa H. Lee

Abstract

Light absorbed by retinal photoreceptors triggers a cascade of reactions that initiate cGMP hydrolysis, cation channel closure and membrane hyperpolarization. Down-regulation of the cascade involves additional proteins that interfere with amplification along the cascade. Pinealocytes are activated by norepinephrine during the dark phase of the day/night cycle. Mature pinealocytes of the mammalian pineal express the known photoreceptor proteins that are implicated in down-regulation of the visual cascade, but the cascade components that produce cGMP hydrolysis and membrane hyperpolarization are absent. Pinealocytes accumulate cyclic AMP minimally when norepinephrine activates their beta adrenergic receptors alone, but the response is potentiated by the simultaneous activation of their alpha-1 adrenergic receptors. A model is proposed whereby phosducin, a phosphoprotein that binds the beta,gamma subunit of G-proteins, could modulate the synthesis of cyclic AMP by buffering the amount of beta,gamma G-protein subunits that are available for activating adenylate cyclase.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 5 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 46%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2022.
All research outputs
#493,622
of 24,579,513 outputs
Outputs from Neurochemical Research
#8
of 2,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156
of 64,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurochemical Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,579,513 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them