↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of electronic fetal monitoring with additional ST analysis in vertex singleton pregnancies at >36 weeks of gestation: an individual participant data metaanalysis

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of electronic fetal monitoring with additional ST analysis in vertex singleton pregnancies at >36 weeks of gestation: an individual participant data metaanalysis
Published in
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, January 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.028
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ewoud Schuit, Isis Amer-Wahlin, Kati Ojala, Christophe Vayssière, Michelle E.M.H. Westerhuis, Karel Maršál, Aydin Tekay, George R. Saade, Gerard H.A. Visser, Rolf H.H. Groenwold, Karel G.M. Moons, Ben Willem J. Mol, Anneke Kwee

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) alone and with additional ST analysis (EFM + ST) in laboring women with a singleton term pregnancy that is in cephalic presentation in the prevention of metabolic acidosis by the application of individual patient data metaanalysis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 17 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 47%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 19 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,388,118
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#5,802
of 13,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,973
of 292,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#37
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.