↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and Safety of Vitamin D Supplementation to Prevent COVID-19 in Frontline Healthcare Workers. A Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Medical Research, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 917)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3447 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
11 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and Safety of Vitamin D Supplementation to Prevent COVID-19 in Frontline Healthcare Workers. A Randomized Clinical Trial
Published in
Archives of Medical Research, April 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.arcmed.2022.04.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miguel A Villasis-Keever, Mardia G López-Alarcón, Guadalupe Miranda-Novales, Jessie N Zurita-Cruz, Aly S Barrada-Vázquez, Joaquín González-Ibarra, Monserrat Martínez-Reyes, Concepción Grajales-Muñiz, Clara E Santacruz-Tinoco, Bernardo Martínez-Miguel, Jorge Maldonado-Hernández, Yazmín Cifuentes-González, Miguel Klünder-Klünder, Juan Garduño-Espinosa, Briseida López-Martínez, Israel Parra-Ortega

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,447 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 8%
Other 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Student > Master 5 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 60 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 64 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2218. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,891
of 25,810,956 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Medical Research
#1
of 917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168
of 449,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Medical Research
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,810,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them