↓ Skip to main content

Influence of Analytical Method on the Fluctuation of Vitamin C Value for Vegetables Listed in the Revised Standard Table of Food Composition in Japan

Overview of attention for article published in The Japanese Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 270)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influence of Analytical Method on the Fluctuation of Vitamin C Value for Vegetables Listed in the Revised Standard Table of Food Composition in Japan
Published in
The Japanese Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics, January 2010
DOI 10.5264/eiyogakuzashi.68.141
Authors

Ayako Kojima, Yoko Sato, Yoko Hashimoto, Tomoko Nakanishi, Keizo Umegaki

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,241,895
of 25,547,904 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics
#4
of 270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,373
of 173,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,547,904 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 270 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them