You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
EEG Source Reconstruction Reveals Frontal-Parietal Dynamics of Spatial Conflict Processing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0057293 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael X Cohen, K. Richard Ridderinkhof |
| Abstract |
Cognitive control requires the suppression of distracting information in order to focus on task-relevant information. We applied EEG source reconstruction via time-frequency linear constrained minimum variance beamforming to help elucidate the neural mechanisms involved in spatial conflict processing. Human subjects performed a Simon task, in which conflict was induced by incongruence between spatial location and response hand. We found an early (∼200 ms post-stimulus) conflict modulation in stimulus-contralateral parietal gamma (30-50 Hz), followed by a later alpha-band (8-12 Hz) conflict modulation, suggesting an early detection of spatial conflict and inhibition of spatial location processing. Inter-regional connectivity analyses assessed via cross-frequency coupling of theta (4-8 Hz), alpha, and gamma power revealed conflict-induced shifts in cortical network interactions: Congruent trials (relative to incongruent trials) had stronger coupling between frontal theta and stimulus-contrahemifield parietal alpha/gamma power, whereas incongruent trials had increased theta coupling between medial frontal and lateral frontal regions. These findings shed new light into the large-scale network dynamics of spatial conflict processing, and how those networks are shaped by oscillatory interactions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 195 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 28% |
| Researcher | 44 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 14% |
| Unknown | 30 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 59 | 28% |
| Neuroscience | 46 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 7% |
| Engineering | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 46 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2013.
All research outputs
#14,164,012
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#115,812
of 193,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,725
of 193,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,933
of 5,363 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,363 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.