↓ Skip to main content

HIV-Infected Men Who Have Sex with Men Who Identify Themselves as Belonging to Subcultures Are at Increased Risk for Hepatitis C Infection

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HIV-Infected Men Who Have Sex with Men Who Identify Themselves as Belonging to Subcultures Are at Increased Risk for Hepatitis C Infection
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0057740
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy Matser, Joost Vanhommerig, Maarten F. Schim van der Loeff, Ronald B. Geskus, Henry J. C. de Vries, Jan M. Prins, Maria Prins, Sylvia M. Bruisten

Abstract

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) emerged as sexually transmitted infection among HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM). We studied whether HCV circulated in identifiable high-risk MSM subcultures and performed phylogenetic analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Student > Master 5 13%
Other 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Computer Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2013.
All research outputs
#12,811,523
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#99,734
of 193,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,730
of 194,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,484
of 5,387 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,387 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.