You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Physiotherapy for pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) types I and II
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010853.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Keith M Smart, Michael C Ferraro, Benedict M Wand, Neil E O'Connell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 18% |
| Ireland | 10 | 11% |
| Australia | 7 | 8% |
| United States | 5 | 6% |
| Canada | 4 | 5% |
| Japan | 3 | 3% |
| Denmark | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 57% |
| Scientists | 26 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 266 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 21 | 8% |
| Researcher | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 45 | 17% |
| Unknown | 144 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 6% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Unknown | 148 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2023.
All research outputs
#654,705
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,152
of 13,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,436
of 446,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.