You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A synthesis of radial growth patterns preceding tree mortality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Change Biology, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1111/gcb.13535 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maxime Cailleret, Steven Jansen, Elisabeth M. R. Robert, Lucía Desoto, Tuomas Aakala, Joseph A. Antos, Barbara Beikircher, Christof Bigler, Harald Bugmann, Marco Caccianiga, Vojtěch Čada, Jesus J. Camarero, Paolo Cherubini, Hervé Cochard, Marie R. Coyea, Katarina Čufar, Adrian J. Das, Hendrik Davi, Sylvain Delzon, Michael Dorman, Guillermo Gea‐Izquierdo, Sten Gillner, Laurel J. Haavik, Henrik Hartmann, Ana‐Maria Hereş, Kevin R. Hultine, Pavel Janda, Jeffrey M. Kane, Vyacheslav I. Kharuk, Thomas Kitzberger, Tamir Klein, Koen Kramer, Frederic Lens, Tom Levanic, Juan C. Linares Calderon, Francisco Lloret, Raquel Lobo‐Do‐Vale, Fabio Lombardi, Rosana López Rodríguez, Harri Mäkinen, Stefan Mayr, Ilona Mészáros, Juha M. Metsaranta, Francesco Minunno, Walter Oberhuber, Andreas Papadopoulos, Mikko Peltoniemi, Any M. Petritan, Brigitte Rohner, Gabriel Sangüesa‐Barreda, Dimitrios Sarris, Jeremy M. Smith, Amanda B. Stan, Frank Sterck, Dejan B. Stojanović, Maria L. Suarez, Miroslav Svoboda, Roberto Tognetti, José M. Torres‐Ruiz, Volodymyr Trotsiuk, Ricardo Villalba, Floor Vodde, Alana R. Westwood, Peter H. Wyckoff, Nikolay Zafirov, Jordi Martínez‐Vilalta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 7 | 30% |
| United States | 6 | 26% |
| Spain | 2 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 61% |
| Scientists | 8 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 582 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 574 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 131 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 128 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 72 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 37 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 5% |
| Other | 81 | 14% |
| Unknown | 103 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 194 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 173 | 30% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 29 | 5% |
| Engineering | 7 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 27 | 5% |
| Unknown | 148 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2017.
All research outputs
#2,827,624
of 25,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#3,455
of 6,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,397
of 317,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#47
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.