↓ Skip to main content

Energy drinks: An emerging public health hazard for youth

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Public Health Policy, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Energy drinks: An emerging public health hazard for youth
Published in
Journal of Public Health Policy, March 2013
DOI 10.1057/jphp.2013.6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer L Pomeranz, Christina R Munsell, Jennifer L Harris

Abstract

Energy drinks are emerging as a public health threat and are increasingly consumed by youth internationally. Energy drinks contain high levels of caffeine, sugar, and novel ingredients, and are often marketed through youth-oriented media and venues. We review these practices and the current inconsistent state of labeling. We also examine international support for regulation of these products, including a survey showing that 85 per cent of United States parents agreed that regulations requiring caffeine content disclosure and warning labels on energy drinks are warranted. We then examine the regulatory structure for energy drinks in the United States, analyzing legal and self-regulatory strategies to protect consumers, especially youth, from these potentially dangerous products. Recommended government interventions include revised labeling requirements, addressing problematic ingredients, and enacting retail restrictions. We conclude by identifying areas for future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 21%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Researcher 11 8%
Other 7 5%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 37 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Psychology 14 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 10%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 43 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2016.
All research outputs
#4,023,127
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Health Policy
#189
of 776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,409
of 196,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Health Policy
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.