↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic Tests in Term Neonates With Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatrics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic Tests in Term Neonates With Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: A Systematic Review
Published in
Pediatrics, January 2013
DOI 10.1542/peds.2012-1297
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henriette van Laerhoven, Timo R. de Haan, Martin Offringa, Bart Post, Johanna H. van der Lee

Abstract

Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) after perinatal asphyxia in term neonates causes long-term neurologic sequelae or death. A reliable evidence-based prognosis is essential. The study goal was to investigate the prognostic value of currently used clinical tests in neonatal patients with perinatal asphyxia and HIE.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 2%
Spain 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 235 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 15%
Researcher 37 15%
Student > Master 30 12%
Other 24 10%
Student > Postgraduate 22 9%
Other 57 23%
Unknown 42 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 138 55%
Neuroscience 13 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Psychology 9 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 51 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2013.
All research outputs
#14,747,687
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Pediatrics
#13,453
of 16,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,253
of 280,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatrics
#155
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.