You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Use of glucosamine and chondroitin supplements and risk of colorectal cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10552-013-0192-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
E. D. Kantor, J. W. Lampe, U. Peters, D. D. Shen, T. L. Vaughan, E. White |
Abstract |
Glucosamine and chondroitin are non-vitamin, non-mineral supplements which have anti-inflammatory properties. These supplements are typically used for joint pain and osteoarthritis and are commonly taken as either glucosamine alone or glucosamine plus chondroitin. An exploratory analysis conducted within the VITamins And Lifestyle (VITAL) study observed any use of glucosamine and chondroitin to be associated with reduced risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) after 5 years of follow-up. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 31% |
Uruguay | 1 | 8% |
Germany | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 57 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 21% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 13% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Professor | 5 | 8% |
Other | 17 | 28% |
Unknown | 8 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 46% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 9 | 15% |
Unknown | 12 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,911,932
of 25,637,545 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#187
of 2,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,095
of 211,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#6
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,637,545 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.