↓ Skip to main content

Intellectual Disability and Hemizygous GPD2 Mutation

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intellectual Disability and Hemizygous GPD2 Mutation
Published in
American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/ajmg.a.35873
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela Q.C.M. Barge‐Schaapveld, Rob Ofman, Alida C. Knegt, Mariëlle Alders, Wolfgang Höhne, Stephan Kemp, Raoul C.M. Hennekam

Abstract

We report on a 25-year-old female with intellectual disability, mildly unusual face, and a pervasive developmental disorder, in whom routine aCGH showed a 298 kb de novo deletion at chromosome 2q24.1(156869529-157167986 × 1). The region contained two genes (NR4A2; GPD2). Molecular studies in the proposita showed an additional variant in GPD2 (c.614C > T, p.Pro205Leu), which was predicted to be pathogenic. The variant was also present in the healthy mother and sister. Functional analysis showed absent GPD2 activity in the proposita and 50% activity in mother and sister. We conclude that we have been able to find circumstantial evidence for the causative effect of the hemizygous GPD2 mutation but full proof remained lacking. Total costs for the work-up in these patients were high (€21,975 [$27,029]). Similar results will increasingly be found when Next Generation Techniques will be applied widely in patients with intellectual disability, and proving pathogenicity by functional studies or in animal models will be expensive. We advocate the use of freely accessible international databases combining phenotype and genotype data using standard nomenclatures to facilitate proving pathogenicity of research data and to decrease costs of health care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Psychology 2 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A
#2,940
of 4,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,347
of 211,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A
#54
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.